It’s easy to
forget that some art forms, specifically operas, are actually still being
created today, considering that some of the most recognizable ones were composed about a
century ago. However, there are indeed contemporary composers whose works focus
on both old and new subject matter and who are reshaping classical music. One
such notable artist is Nico Muhly, the youngest composer commissioned by the
Metropolitan Opera. He is a particularly interesting figure not for his youth
or personality (although those two factors have made him a hot commodity in the
classical music realm), but because of the subject matter that he writes about
and is inspired by. The themes range “from Renaissance astrology to the ethics
of artificial intelligence.” His work is phenomenal, and he is considered to be
a very sought-after collaborator. He has
worked with several choreographers, and he has contributed to many bands as an
arranger. He has also worked on the scores for films such as Kill Your Darlings; Me, Earl and the Dying Girl; and the Academy Award-winning The Reader.
Muhly has been
turning out new projects rapid fired and describes his productivity as
“fiercely unambitious.” He says,
“I have never made a plan that has anything to do with my career, or my
‘trajectory’ or whatever euphemistic phrase I’m meant to use. Instead, I work — not to repeat the word —
vigorously on everything, so that the work itself is the ambition.” He draws a
lot of his inspiration
from seemingly random things and builds an entire piece around that one
specific concept. Here is one such example:
“Commissioned
for countertenor and lute, Old Bones
grows out of the buzz surrounding the 2012 discovery of Richard III’s body
under a parking lot in Leicester. For the sung text, Muhly draws from the
scientific press release confirming the body’s identity, a slightly poetic but
delirious interview with the president of the Scottish branch of the Richard
III Society and an ode to Richard’s killer by a “slightly gay” Welsh war poet.
This unexpected combination of texts paints a fuller picture not of the king,
but of the circumstances of his exhumation – a decidedly unconventional and
contemporary distinction. Indeed, Muhly said that his goal was to allow for
multiple interpretations, such as reverence for Richard or his killer.”
This piece in particular does not
necessarily tell a narrative, but the story is there and it is intentionally
weaved into all the musical decisions.
Muhly is
incredibly creative because of his ability to tell stories about such oddly
specific things, but he does so in a truly innovative way. “It is hypothesized that the more accessible
and diverse the creative material available to artists and the more artists can
lower the risks of experimentation, the more likely it is that artists can see
opportunities for creativity or be forced to assimilate material from earlier
periods into something fresh and new that succeeds with audiences, critics, or
both” (Uzzi & Spiro). So it’s not necessarily the source material itself
that makes Muhly’s work so creative, but rather the unconventionality of his
thought process regarding the material, coupled with the beautiful output. It’s
evident that at age 35, Muhly is already wrapping the world of classical music
tightly around his finger.
Uzzi, Brian, and Jarrett Spiro. "Collaboration and
Creativity: The Small World Problem." American Journal of Sociology 111.2
(2005): 447-504. Web
I thought it is different how Muhly's work is unambitious, because a lot of other creatives' works have all aimed to fight some problem, or at least raise attention to it in some way. This is a good example of creativity that draws from everyday life, and he can construct it in such a way that is unique. I wonder though, what inspired him to commit to his composing style, and is it purely out of intrinsic values? Since honors students have to go to the opera, I know I appreciated the style more than I did beforehand, but Muhly's work is interesting because he's able to assimilate a classical art form into a modern era. Overall, good article though!
ReplyDelete