Sunday, February 18, 2024

Billy Corgan’s Blank Page is an Open Door for Creativity

Chicagoland natives are likely familiar with or even frequent patrons of Madame Zuzu's, but few know the inner workings of the musical genius behind the popular cafe. Best known as the lead singer and lyrical mastermind of the iconic band the Smashing Pumpkins, William (Billy) Patrick Corgan Jr.’s creative risks have paved the way for alternative rock and post-punk music. From Gish (1991) to ATUM (2023), his songwriting has transcended genres and pushed musical boundaries for decades. 

Corgan was born in Elk Grove, Illinois on March 17, 1967, to William Corgan Sr. and Martha Louise Maes Corgan Lutz. His father was a blues guitarist, sparking his passion for music from an early age. As a teenager, he taught himself to play guitar, and at 18 he formed his first band, Marked. Despite the goth metal group’s temporary relocation to Florida in hopes of taking off there, Marked’s success was short-lived. They disbanded after a year, and Corgan returned home to Chicago. In 1988, Corgan formed the Smashing Pumpkins with James Iha, Darcy Wretzky, and Jimmy Chamberlin. Their debut album, Gish, was released in 1991, followed by Siamese Dream in 1993 and Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness in 1995. The group briefly disbanded after releasing Machina II/The Friends & Enemies of Modern Music (2000), and Corgan created another group called Zwan with Chamberlin, Matt Sweeney, and David Pajo. Zwan released only one record before ultimately breaking up over personal issues between band members. In 2007, Corgan and Chamberlin revived the Pumpkins and they’ve been creating music and touring ever since, with twelve studio albums out to date. Their music is known for combining goth rock, heavy metal, and psychedelic/dream pop, with Corgan's ingenious lyricism at the forefront of their discography’s angsty aesthetic. 


 

The Smashing Pumpkins in 2018: (from left to right) Jimmy Chamberlin, Billy Corgan, James Iha, Jeff Schroeder 

Much of Corgan’s creativity stems from deep introspection. In a 2018 interview, Corgan revealed that, through meditation and Buddhism, he developed a healthy perception of creativity and success that has ultimately helped his songwriting process. He learned to detach creativity from survival and to let go of the childhood paranoia that had prevented him from trusting those in his circle. Now, he approaches his work with a new mindset. “I’m just going to do my work and it’s going to go where it’s going to go” says Corgan. Adopting this idea of writing music for himself instead of for others was a pivotal moment in unlocking his creativity. The freedom of not writing for arbitrary and subjective standards of success- in other words, the freedom of being secure in the value of his work regardless of outside reassurance- allowed him to truly create. The Pumpkins’ 1998 album, Adore, marks this shift in attitude for Corgan.  

Rick Rubin, a music producer known for co-founding Def Jam Recordings with Russell Simmons, made a song for Adore called “Let Me Give the World to You”. It almost made the album but was cut at the last minute because the Pumpkins’ record label wanted to make it the first single, and Corgan refused to let a pop song represent and introduce his alternative rock masterpiece. This was the moment Corgan realized his creative vision was driven by the need to stay true to his own voice and ideas. He acknowledged that, in retrospect, Adore might have charted or sold better if he had allowed the label to make that song a single. However, in refusing to become a sellout, he realized that remaining loyal to and preserving his voice and artistic vision was critical to sustaining his creativity in the long run. His practice of self-reflection and the healthy mindset it produced allowed him to recognize the danger of sacrificing his creative process to appease the label. In this way, Corgan’s relationship to creativity reflects some advice in Rubin’s book, The Creative Act: A Way of Being. Like Corgan, Rubin encourages readers to tap into their creative sides through Buddhism, mindfulness, and a sense of self-assuredness. Despite not using Rubin’s song for the album, Corgan’s collaboration with the music producer seems to have greatly influenced his approach to songwriting. 

 

Album cover for Adore (1998) 

 

Like many artists, Corgan suffered from a fear of peaking in success and never making an album as great as the last. This fear is accompanied by doubt regarding future projects, as many feel pressured to exceed the last record in terms of tangible markers of success like awards and sales. Somewhere between Adore and Cyr (2020), the Pumpkins lost their confidence, and Cyr, says Corgan, “is the result of us getting our confidence back”. Through his own personal growth and reflection, he found that his creativity blossomed once he proudly accepted his and the band’s identity. This renewed confidence, coupled with his healthy relationship to success, meant he was free from the stylistic and idiomatic expectations that had been constraining his creativity. By rejecting an identity defined by a specific genre, he allows himself to write outside the confines of any one kind of music. This too is a creative tactic mentioned in Rubin’s book. Rubin encourages creativity through the avoidance of labeling one’s work before or during the creative process, as this subconsciously influences and constricts one’s creativity. Going into the studio set on recording a pop song, for example, is a mindset laced with unspoken rules and expectations regarding what a pop song ‘should’ sound like. Without realizing it, the artist is now confined by this imaginary and meaningless box they’ve unknowingly placed themselves in. Corgan’s success in breaking free from these genre-specific constraints was possible only through his acceptance of the band’s fluid identity and is a clear display of Rubin’s advice.  

 

Corgan no longer sees self-doubt as debilitating. Like Rubin, he believes self-doubt and self-criticism are, once mastered, central to creativity. According to Corgan, all good artists continue to criticize their work until it's perfect. He starts with a blank page, he explains, and through every step of the songwriting process a little voice in his head criticizes everything he makes, saying ‘Is there a better version? From start to finish, he doubts the song he's making, always questioning whether it aligns with his creative vision. “It’s like a constant argument” he says, “of aesthetics, messaging, personality, ego” and originality. Corgan has mastered his self-doubt and molded it into a tool that promotes rather than stifles his creativity. Rubin’s book explores this fine line drawn by self-doubt, explaining that questioning one’s ability to ever make good music again inhibits their creativity. Doubting whether one’s work is the very best it can be, however, encourages creativity in the pursuit of perfection.  

 

In addition to introspection, Corgan's creative process has a lot to do with his personality. In an interview with Rick Beato, Corgan discusses the dichotomy between the technical and emotional parts of songwriting. “There’s the math of the music and then there’s the emotional part” he explains. Anyone can understand and execute the math aspect; it’s the emotional part that can’t be taught. This is very reminiscent of the popular Myers Briggs personality types, as one of the test’s preference pairs is Thinking (T) or Feeling (F). Those that are more Thinking make decisions based on logic, while those that are more Feeling make decisions based on emotions. According to Corgan, creativity in music requires a bit of both, but the feeling aspect- or what he refers to as an “emotional personality”- is the more important of the two. Creativity requires an innate sense of emotionality, Corgan explains. You either have it or you don’t, and Corgan has it if his band’s success is any indication.  

 

From the unparalleled rhythm and solos of Siamese Dream to the nostalgic angst of Adore, Billy Corgan’s ingenious lyricism and bold, genre-bending records continue to redefine the creative standards of music.  

 

Sources: 

John Green: The Freedom of Failure

If you have ever created anything, you probably did not get it right on the first try. Unfortunately, humans are not machines who always act according to their inputs. Humans are messy and often fail. For many creatives, this failure can be overwhelming or upsetting. However, John Green, a well-known young adult author, is open about his relationship with failure, mainly because he does not let the fear of failure prevent him from writing.

Many people know John Green from his masterful works like The Fault in Our Stars, Looking For Alaska, and Turtles All the Way Down. His first novel, Looking For Alaska, was published in 2005. Since its publication, John Green has been a household name in the world of young adult novels. However, even for a globally known author like John Green, it can be challenging to start writing and know that the first or even the first six drafts will not be good enough to publish. What does John Green’s writing process teach us about creativity and what it means to be human?


John Green, seen here with many of his novels

“The ideas for my books come from lowercase-i ideas

When asked how he comes up with ideas for his novels, Green explains that he has never had an idea come to him all at once, what he calls a capital-I Idea. Instead, Green’s creative process mirrors many other creatives because he creates using the Geneplore Model. The Geneplor Model was a model of the creative process developed by Finke, Ward, and Smith. This model shows the connection between divergent and convergent thinking. Green’s process starts with a lowercase-i idea. In his own words, Green explains, “Little ideas will come along and link up to other little ideas, then in a few short years, I have a book.” These little ideas are examples of the generation of pre-inventive structures or divergent thinking. These are ideas that act as starting points for Green when he writes. Then, Green researches these ideas as much as he can. When writing The Fault in Our Stars, a novel that centers around teenagers who had cancer, Green interviewed many cancer survivors and their families to better understand and write believable characters. This is an example of preinventive exploration and interpretation, or convergent thinking.

Green’s process of combining smaller ideas and research into a book exemplifies the collecting thinking style. This thinking style occurs when someone combines inputs from many different sources and uses them to solve a problem or create something new. For Green, this collection includes research, editing, and talking to people in his life, including his editor and his wife. Green even explained that many of the most famous lines from his novels are from his wife. Even if they may have been discussing something entirely unrelated to his current novel, this ability to relate external factors to his creative works makes Green an exceptional writer and creative.

 

"It doesn’t really matter much if on a particular day
I write beautiful and brilliant prose that will
stick in the minds of my readers forever, because
there’s a 90% chance I’m just gonna delete whatever
I write anyway." 

“I just give myself permission to suck

When asked how to deal with writer’s block, Green explained that he does not get caught up with failing because he usually deletes about 90% of his first drafts. Failing often holds people back, especially when they are afraid to fail. However, failing is a natural, important part of being human. In the book The Creative Spark by Agustin Fuentes, Fuentes writes about how vital failing was for human evolution and why it is a problem that society today sees failing as unfavorable or something to avoid. In the chapter “The Beat of your Creative Life,” Fuentes writes about how ancient humans did not learn to communicate or create tools on their first try. It took humans thousands of years to create a society, tools, ways to avoid predators, and create art. Historians agree that without failure, we would not be where we are today.

If progress is impossible without failure, why do we fear failure so much? Fuentes explains that many societies see failure as a flaw or weakness. People are afraid to fail because they do not want to be seen as a failure themselves. For many cultures, failing at art is seen as even worse because art is often associated with frivolity. For centuries, art has been restricted to people with the money and time to create and enjoy art. Although art is more accessible today, both to create and enjoy, this association between art and frivolity is seen repeatedly. For example, think of the response that someone gets when they say they are going to college for writing, visual arts, or creative arts compared to the response when someone is going to college for a science or math degree. This idea that art is not a practical use of time and skill makes the response to failure when attempting art much more critical.

Society should take John Green’s advice and be open to failing. When we fail, rather than being disappointed, we should learn from that failure and create something better. Although this philosophy is easier said than done, it can be easy to start failing. I am afraid to fail. Throughout my life, I have tried to be the best I can be at school and take great pride in my grades. I have never let myself fail, especially in school. However, I have recently been looking for places outside of school where I can let myself fail. There is a partially started puzzle in my room that I haven’t gone back to in weeks. There is a shrine in Zelda that I have rage-quit twice because I cannot defeat it. These are not significant failures, but maybe by letting myself accept and grow from the small failures, I can create new things when facing larger failures. This week, I aim to find a new way to learn from failure and finally finish the border of that puzzle. 


For more information about John Green and to see the quotes I used for this article, please follow this link