If you have ever created anything, you probably did not get it right on the first try. Unfortunately, humans are not machines who always act according to their inputs. Humans are messy and often fail. For many creatives, this failure can be overwhelming or upsetting. However, John Green, a well-known young adult author, is open about his relationship with failure, mainly because he does not let the fear of failure prevent him from writing.
Many people know John Green from his masterful works like The Fault in Our Stars, Looking For Alaska, and Turtles All the Way Down. His first novel, Looking For Alaska, was published in 2005. Since its publication, John Green has been a household name in the world of young adult novels. However, even for a globally known author like John Green, it can be challenging to start writing and know that the first or even the first six drafts will not be good enough to publish. What does John Green’s writing process teach us about creativity and what it means to be human?
John Green, seen here with many of his novels
“The ideas for my books
come from lowercase-i ideas”
When asked how he
comes up with ideas for his novels, Green explains that he has never had an
idea come to him all at once, what he calls a capital-I Idea. Instead, Green’s
creative process mirrors many other creatives because he creates using
the Geneplore Model. The Geneplor Model was a model of the creative process developed
by Finke, Ward, and Smith. This model shows the connection between divergent
and convergent thinking. Green’s process starts with a lowercase-i idea. In his own words, Green explains, “Little ideas will come along and link up to other little ideas, then in a few short years, I have a book.” These little
ideas are examples of the generation of pre-inventive structures or divergent
thinking. These are ideas that act as starting points for Green when he writes. Then, Green researches these ideas as much as he can. When writing The Fault in Our Stars, a novel that centers around
teenagers who had cancer, Green interviewed many cancer survivors and their
families to better understand and write believable characters. This is an
example of preinventive exploration and interpretation, or convergent thinking.
Green’s process of combining smaller ideas and research into a book exemplifies the collecting thinking style. This thinking style occurs when someone combines inputs from
many different sources and uses them to solve a problem or create something
new. For Green, this collection includes research, editing, and talking to people in his life, including his editor and his wife. Green even explained that
many of the most famous lines from his novels are from his wife. Even if they
may have been discussing something entirely unrelated to his current novel,
this ability to relate external factors to his creative works makes Green an
exceptional writer and creative.
“I just give myself
permission to suck”
When asked how to deal with writer’s block, Green explained that he does not get caught up with failing because he usually deletes about 90% of his first drafts. Failing often
holds people back, especially when they are afraid to fail. However, failing is
a natural, important part of being human. In the book The Creative Spark
by Agustin Fuentes, Fuentes writes about how vital failing was for human
evolution and why it is a problem that society today sees failing as unfavorable
or something to avoid. In the chapter “The Beat of your Creative Life,” Fuentes
writes about how ancient humans did not learn to communicate or create
tools on their first try. It took humans thousands of years to create a society, tools, ways to avoid predators, and create art. Historians agree that without failure, we would not be where we are today.
If progress is impossible without failure, why do we fear failure so much? Fuentes explains that
many societies see failure as a flaw or weakness. People are afraid
to fail because they do not want to be seen as a failure themselves. For many
cultures, failing at art is seen as even worse because art is often associated
with frivolity. For centuries, art has been restricted to people with the
money and time to create and enjoy art. Although art is more accessible today,
both to create and enjoy, this association between art and frivolity is seen
repeatedly. For example, think of the response that someone gets when they
say they are going to college for writing, visual arts, or creative arts
compared to the response when someone is going to college for a science or math
degree. This idea that art is not a practical use of time and skill makes the response
to failure when attempting art much more critical.
Society should
take John Green’s advice and be open to failing. When we fail, rather than
being disappointed, we should learn from that failure and create something
better. Although this philosophy is easier said than done, it can be easy to
start failing. I am afraid to fail. Throughout my life, I have tried to be the best I can be at school and take great pride in my grades. I have never let
myself fail, especially in school. However, I have recently been looking for
places outside of school where I can let myself fail. There is a partially started puzzle in my room that I haven’t gone back to in weeks. There is a shrine
in Zelda that I have rage-quit twice because I cannot defeat it. These are not significant
failures, but maybe by letting myself accept and grow from the small failures,
I can create new things when facing larger failures. This week, I aim to find a new way to learn from failure and finally finish the border of
that puzzle.
For more information about John Green and to see the quotes I used for this article, please follow this link
I am a big fan of John Green and his books, but I didn’t know anything about his creative process before reading this blog post. I can appreciate the emphasis Green places on failure because I agree that failure is essential to success and progression. I think his concept of many lowercase “ideas” combining to form a big “Idea” is interesting because it isn’t typical for huge, genius ideas to strike suddenly at once without any buildup. Plus, the way he incorporates things from his own life into his novels is impressive. I believe that great stories are the ones that originally stem from experience. I think stories like those allow the author to pull on what they know and what they have experienced, and to then develop and elaborate on it further. Personally, the stories that are created with thought and effort and based on realistic experiences are the ones I want to read, and I think John Green is an author who fits into that category quite well.
ReplyDeleteI have also read the majority of John Greene's books, one of my favorites being "The Fault in Our Stars". I would never have guessed that it sometimes takes him years and multiple drafts before his books hit the shelves. I find it really encouraging that failure is incorporated into his creative process and necessary for his final product, rather than seen as something to avoid at all costs. If John Greene didn't "fail" and have to draft multiple books, trash ideas that didn't pan out, or interview people in order to better understand his own characters, then his books would not be nearly as good and we probably wouldn't know his name today.
ReplyDeleteI was also really intrigued by the Geneplor model that you mentioned in paragraph 3 of your post, so I looked into it a bit more. I found out that Gene stands for "Generative Thinking" whereas "Plore" stands for exploratory thinking. The divergent thinking that you mentioned for the first step reminds me of brainstorming without judgement and letting ideas flow no matter how small they may seem. Oftentimes, these ideas can grow into more complex and connected concepts - like a whole book! I think that I could use this approach a lot more in my academic life; I sometimes get so stuck in not wanted an idea to be stupid that I don't think of an idea at all! The convergent thinking process that follows is used to develop and refine the ideas that you already have, which can involve incorporating feedback. I really like how John Greene was patient with this process, interviewed people, and incorporated input from his daily life (like sayings from his wife) into his writing. I could definitely incorporate this into my life by not compartmentalizing my thoughts as much. Who knows, maybe a thought that I have in my chemistry class could relate to creativity!