Leonardo di ser Piero da Vinci, best known for his expressive artwork including the Mona Lisa and The Last Supper, was much more than just a painter. He was an artist, scientist, engineer, and visionary whose work transcended the boundaries of any single discipline. His relentless pursuit of knowledge across multiple fields mirrors the interdisciplinary spirit of the modern scientific breakthroughs outlined in The Code Breaker by Walter Isaacson. Specifically, his journey relates to the unique road to discovery and ethical dilemmas of CRISPR gene-editing technology.
Da Vinci’s famous notebooks reveal incredible parallels across disciplines, drawing connections between anatomy and art, engineering and nature, and mathematics and design. His studies of the human body contributed to his painting accuracy but also assisted in the development of anatomical science as a whole. Similarly, Jennifer Doudna and her collaborators ventured beyond the confines of molecular biology, integrating insights from chemistry, genetics, and bioinformatics to harness CRISPR's gene-editing potential.
Another compelling parallel between da Vinci and Doudna lies in their collaborative approaches. While da Vinci thrived in the intellectually rich environment of Renaissance Italy, constantly exchanging ideas with peers, Doudna's journey with CRISPR involved global collaboration and the open exchange of knowledge. Isaacson's portrayal of Doudna's story emphasizes how modern science thrives on teamwork, much like the collaborative spirit of da Vinci's time.
Yet, both figures also grappled with the ethical implications of their work. Da Vinci's anatomical studies were often considered controversial, challenging societal norms of his time. In The Code Breaker, Doudna confronts the profound ethical questions of gene editing, from curing genetic diseases to the potential for designer babies. The tension between innovation and ethics is a thread that binds both of their legacies.
This is awesome!! Never thought to compare the discovery of CRISPR and some of the first groundbreaking (and accurate) diagrams of human anatomy. With roots in anatomy and going against social norms, you really have depicted the similar challenges faced by Doudna and Da Vinci, and how that led to collaboration across disciplines. Overall, great read!
ReplyDeleteLeonardo Da Vinci truly was the embodiment of the well-rounded and intelligent Renaissance man. The creation of CRISPR is also an example of introducing more general creative concepts into research. For example Rick Rubin discussed how creativity lies in between discipline and freedom. CRISPR is a perfect example of this. From personal experience, molecular biology research of any kind requires an immense amount of discipline (conducting experiments and applying for grants), but when researching freedom is also required (exploring new ideas, different forms of manipulating genes in this case). Interesting post!
ReplyDeleteThis post was very intriguing! I feel like I only ever think of da Vinci in terms of his art (obviously the Mona Lisa comes to mind), but I forget how many disciplines he participated in: mathematics, engineering, anatomy, sculpture, etc. This reminds me of what we discussed in class, how its important to be open to experiences, to other disciplines, to collaboration, in order to excel in our own creative pursuits. Perhaps interdisciplinary study is integral to truly great and unique creativity. Clearly it worked for both da Vinci and Jennifer Doudna!
ReplyDeleteThe way you underlined the importance of collaboration for both da Vinci and Doudna was very impactful for me -- these are figures usually perceived as being one-person visionaries, and their collaborators are often swallowed by the former's shadow. Creativity seems to require collaboration, from groundbreaking scientific discoveries to innovation in music; the comparison between the figures you gave was insightful and absorbing!
ReplyDeleteThis was very interesting. Da Vinci is a type of interdisciplinary person that would stop at nothing in the pursuit of knowledge. A person like him is what the modern world sometimes lack. Today the main thing that is pushed by the world is to specialize at one thing, or to just become really good at one thing. This is not necessarily a bad thing, but it is great to, like da Vinci, become knowledgeable in many areas of study. It is truly fascinating how he was so able to weave together so many disciplines of science in order to invent great things. His creativity in this way is unmatched.
ReplyDelete